2015 Guam 25
People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julieon Edward Quichocho Kim, Defendant-Appellant, CRA14-020
View official PDF ↗People v. Kim, 2015 Guam 25, Opinion
Page 13 of 13
[281 Kim’s conduct as charged did not satisfy the elements of burglary. Accordingly, Kim’s burglary conviction is reversed and vacated. The remaining issues on appeal concerning (1) whether the indictment was properly amended, (2) whether the Amended Indictment was duplicitous, and (3) whether §9 GCA § 37.20Guam Code Annotatedstatute — binding is void for vagueness need not be considered. See Presto v. Lizama, 2012 Guam 24 ¶ 54. V. CONCLUSION [291 The trial court improperly extended the definition of “separately secured or occupied portion thereof’ to include a fenced enclosure. For the foregoing reasons, we REVERSE Kim’s burglary conviction, VACATE the burglary sentence imposed, and REMAND this matter to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
7. Philip Carbulildo F. PHILIP CARBULLIDO Associate Justice
5ed Katherine A. Maraman KATHERiNE A. MARAMAN Associate Justice
Origna1Signed: Robert J. Torres ROBERT J. TORRES Chief Justice
Io 4 1 doanibtNiJeiboYjniC1a1tn1dd. yIcnotrhre.cot (Ike cleik o ttw Suprn1 Cowt o
Q( Guam.
AUG 2 02015
Cited by (3)
- 2016 Guam 41 — People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Xo Isi John, aka Isitero Fred, aka Isiteno Fred, aka John Isiteno, aka Fred Isi John, aka Essay, Defendant-Appellant, CRA16-003 · 2ד…Kim, 2015 Guam 25 ¶ 13.…”
- 2016 Guam 15 — The People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Greg Anthony Cruz, Defendant-Appellant, CRA15-009“…Kim, 2015 Guam 25 ¶ 28.…”
- 2015 Guam 38 — Michael W. Kennedy, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh Sule, Defendant-Appellant, CVA14-015“…Kim, 2015 Guam 25 ~ 28; Presto v.…”
Authorities cited (1)
- 2012 Guam 24 — Francis X. Presto, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clare A.C. Lizama, Defendant-Appellant, and Therese C. Carlos, Amparo Diaz Gumataotao Garcia, Mercedes Flores Grantham, James Grantham, and Robin D. Grantham, Defendants ¶ 54“…Lizama, 2012 Guam 24 ¶ 54. V.…”
Citations are extracted verbatim from the opinions’ own text — each entry quotes the sentence it was found in. Only citations to opinions in this corpus are linked; none are inferred.
Reconstructed from the archived text of the opinion. For the authoritative version, see the official PDF.