T·R
← Search

5 GCA § 5425

Authority to Resolve Protested Solicitations and Awards

Guam Code AnnotatedTitle 5 — Government Operations
View official PDF ↗

(a)Right to Protest. Any actual or prospective bidder, offeror, or contractor who may be aggrieved in connection with the method of source selection, solicitation or award of a contract, may protest to the Chief Procurement Officer, the Director of Public Works or the head of a purchasing agency. The protest shall be submitted in writing within fourteen

(14)days after such aggrieved person knows or should know of the facts giving rise thereto.

(b)Authority to Resolve Protests. The Chief Procurement Officer, the Director of Public Works, the head of a purchasing agency, or a designee of one of these officers shall have the authority, prior to the commencement of an action in court concerning the controversy, to settle and resolve a protest of an aggrieved bidder, offeror, or contractor, actual or prospective, concerning the solicitation or award of a contract. This authority shall be exercised in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Policy Office.

(c)Decision. If the protest is not resolved by mutual agreement, the Chief Procurement Officer, the Director of Public Works, the head of a purchasing agency, or a designee of one of these officers shall promptly issue a decision in writing. The decision shall:

(1)state the reasons for the action taken; and

(2)inform the protestant of its right to administrative and judicial review.

(d)Notice of Decision. A copy of the decision under Subsection

(c)of this Section shall be mailed or otherwise furnished immediately to the protestant and any other party intervening.

(e)Appeal. A decision under Subsection

(c)of this Section including a decision there under regarding entitlement to costs as provided by Subsection

(h)of this Section, may be appealed by the protestant, to the Public Auditor within fifteen

(15)days after receipt by the protestant of the notice of decision. CH. 5 GUAM PROCUREMENT LAW

(f)Finality. A decision of the Public Auditor is final unless a person adversely affected by the decision commences an action in the Superior Court in accordance with Subsection

(a)of § 5480 of this Chapter.

(g)In the event of a timely protest under Subsection

(a)of this Section or under Subsection

(a)of § 5480 of this Chapter, Guam shall not proceed further with the solicitation or with the award of the contract prior to final resolution of such protest, and any such further action is void, unless:

(1)The Chief Procurement Officer or the Director of Public Works after consultation with and written concurrence of the head of the using or purchasing agency and the Attorney General or designated Deputy Attorney General, makes a written determination that the award of the contract without delay is necessary to protect substantial interests of Guam; and

(2)Absent a declaration of emergency by I Maga’håga/Maga’låhi, the protestant has been given at least two

(2)days notice (exclusive of Guam holidays); and

(3)If the protest is pending before the Public Auditor or the Court, the Public Auditor or Court has confirmed such determination, or if no such protest is pending, no protest to the Public Auditor of such determination is filed prior to expiration of the two

(2)day period specified in Item

(2)of Subsection

(g)of this Section.

(h)Entitlement to Costs. In addition to any other relief or remedy granted under Subsection

(c)or

(e)of this Section or under Subsection

(a)of § 5480 of this Chapter, including the remedies provided by Subarticle B of Article 9 of this Chapter, when a protest is sustained, the protestant shall be entitled to the reasonable costs incurred in connection with the solicitation and protest, including bid preparation costs, excluding attorney’s fees, if:

(1)the protestant should have been awarded the contract under the solicitation but was not; or

(2)there is a reasonable likelihood that the protestant may have been awarded the contract but for the breach of any ethical obligation imposed by Subarticle B of Article 11 of this Chapter or the willful or reckless violation of any applicable procurement law or regulation. The Public Auditor shall have the power to assess reasonable costs including reasonable attorney fees incurred by the government, including its autonomous agencies and public corporations, against a protestant upon its finding that the protest was made fraudulently, frivolously or solely to disrupt the procurement process.

§ The story of this section

  1. Amended by P.L. 18-44 § 2 (bill & sponsor pending — earlier Legislature not yet ingested)
  2. Amended by P.L. 28-68 § IV — introduced as Bill 11-28

Interpreted by the courts:

  • 2000 Guam 19Pacific Rock Corporation v. Department of Education, a department of the Executive Branch of the Government of Guam, an (2000) · per Benjamin J.F. Cruz, J.
  • 2001 Guam 14Bank of Guam, a Guam Bank Corporation v. Michael J. Reidy, as Director for the Department of Administration (2001) · per Benjamin J.F. Cruz, J.
  • 2004 Guam 15Guam Imaging Consultants, Inc., and RADS, a General Partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Guam Memorial Hospital Authori (2004) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2012 Guam 25Town House Department Stores, Inc., dba Island Business Systems & Supplies, Appellant, v. Department of Education, Gover (2012) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2013 Guam 27Data Management Resources, LLC, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Office of Public Accountability, Respondent-Appellant (2013) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2015 Guam 13Teleguam Holdings, LLC, and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Territory of Guam; Department of Admi (2015) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2018 Guam 5Teleguam Holdings LLC and its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Territory of Guam; Department of Adminis (2018) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2020 Guam 14DFS GUAM L.P., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant vs. The A.B. Won Pat International Airport Authority, Guam, Defendant- (2020) · per Katherine A. Maraman, J.
  • 2020 Guam 20DFS Guam L.P., Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. The A.B. Won Pat International Airport Authority, Guam, Defendant- (2020) · per Katherine A. Maraman, J.
  • 2024 Guam 4Pacific Data Systems, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee v. Guam Department of Education, Defendant-Appellee, Teleguam Holdings LL (2024) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.
  • 2025 Guam 10SH Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Territory of Guam; General Services Agency, Department of Administration; (2025) · per F. Philip Carbullido, J.

Reconstructed from the Guam Code Annotated. For the authoritative version, see the official PDF.