19 GCA § 5106
Certification for Criminal Proceedings
View official PDF ↗(a)If a child is sixteen
(16)years of age or older at the time he committed the offense for which he is charged, and if the COL11/29/2022 CH. 5 FAMILY COURT ACT conduct is a misdemeanor or a felony of the third degree, and if the court after full investigation deems it contrary to the best interest of such child or of the public to retain jurisdiction, the court may, in its discretion, certify such child for proper criminal proceedings to any court which would have trial jurisdiction of such offense if committed by an adult. A child who is sixteen
(16)years of age or older at the time he committed the offense for which he is charged shall automatically be charged as an adult for any act which would constitute a felony of the first or second degree along with any acts which are misdemeanors or felonies of the third degree which are part of the same scheme of criminal activity as the felony. If a child is under sixteen years of age at the time he committed the offense for which he is charged, and if the conduct would constitute an offense under 9 GCA Chapter 16 (Homicides), and if the court after full investigation deems it contrary to the best interest of such child or of the public to retain jurisdiction, the court may, in its discretion, certify such child for proper criminal proceedings to any court which would have trial jurisdiction of such offense if committed by an adult. If a child is certified as an adult, the same judge shall not, in turn preside over the criminal proceedings against such child.
(b)If a person over the age of eighteen
(18)years, over whom the court retains jurisdiction under this Title, is subject to a commitment or probation order of the Family Division and is charged with any offense against the laws of Guam not triable in the Traffic Division of the Court, such person shall be tried and punished as an adult. If, during the pendency of such adult proceedings, the person would be entitled to bail as an adult, the Superior Court shall, instead of releasing such person, remand him to the custody of the department, agency, or institution to which he was committed at the time of the bail proceedings. If such person was not committed under this Title, but was on probation, he may be admitted to bail and the conditions of his probation under this Title made a part of the conditions of his bail. Nothing in this Section shall prevent the Family Division, upon the appropriate proceedings, from taking action against such person based upon a violation of his conditions of probation.
(c)Should the adult proceedings against any person described in Subsection (b), above, be terminated for any reason, COL11/29/2022 CH. 5 FAMILY COURT ACT or such person released from the judgment of the adult court, including by the completion of any adult sentence, before the person has reached his twenty-first
(21st)birthday, such person shall be remanded to the jurisdiction of the Family Division for the completion of his original juvenile disposition. Upon such remand, the judge of the Family Division may determine, in light of all the circumstances then existing, whether this person shall be returned to the custody of the juvenile institution to which he had been committed at the time he was sentenced as an adult or, whether, because of such conviction and other circumstances, a modification of the juvenile commitment, or discharge from the jurisdiction of the Family Division, should be made. The court may continue the juvenile confinement, or may release the person from the jurisdiction of the Family Court, or may modify the order previously issued in any manner the court deems necessary.
(d)Notwithstanding Subsection
(a)of this Section, on motion of either the prosecutor or defendant, or sua sponte by the Court, the complaint or indictment may be transferred to the jurisdiction of the Family Court upon a finding based on clear and convincing evidence that the best interest of the minor would be amenable to the care, treatment, and training programs available through the facilities of the juvenile court based on an evaluation of the following:
(1)the age of the minor;
(2)the history of the minor, including:
(A)any previous delinquent or criminal history of the minor;
(B)any previous abuse or neglect history of the minor; and
(C)any mental health, physical or educational history of the minor, or a combination of these factors;
(3)the circumstances of the offense, including:
(A)the seriousness of the offense;
(B)whether the minor is charged through accountability; COL11/29/2022 CH. 5 FAMILY COURT ACT
(C)whether there is evidence the offense was committed in an aggressive and premeditated manner;
(D)whether there is evidence the offense caused seriously bodily harm; and
(E)whether there is evidence the minor possessed a deadly weapon;
(4)the advantages of treatment within the juvenile justice system, including, whether there are facilities or programs, or both, particularly available in the juvenile system;
(5)whether the security of the public requires sentencing under Title 9, Chapter 80 of the Guam Code Annotated;
(6)the minor’s history of services, including the minor’s willingness to participate meaningfully in available services;
(7)whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the minor can be rehabilitated before the expiration of the juvenile court’s jurisdiction; and
(8)the adequacy of the punishment or services. In considering these factors, the court shall give greater weight to the seriousness of the alleged offense and the minor’s prior record of delinquency than to the other factors listed in this Subsection.
§ The story of this section
- Affected by P.L. 17-12 § 2 (bill & sponsor pending — earlier Legislature not yet ingested)
- Amended by P.L. 17-27 § 4 (bill & sponsor pending — earlier Legislature not yet ingested)
- Enacted by P.L. 33-33 § 3 · introduced by Brant T. McCreadie + 14 cosponsors · lead sponsor unverified
Interpreted by the courts:
- 1997 Guam 13 — People of the Territory of Guam vs. Doreen Quichocho (1997) · pinpoints (a) at ¶2
- 1997 Guam 6 — People of the Territory of Guam vs. Dwayne S. Quenga (1997) · per Peter C. Siguenza, J. · pinpoints (a) at ¶1
- 1999 Guam 21 — Monarlito E. Naron vs. Eduardo C. Bitanga (1999) · per Benjamin J.F. Cruz, J. · cited at ¶12
- 2017 Guam 13 — People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Benavente Gomia, Defendant-Appellant (2017) · per Katherine A. Maraman, J. · pinpoints (a) at ¶10
Reconstructed from the Guam Code Annotated. For the authoritative version, see the official PDF.